Theodore J. Chalupsky, Appellant, versus. Dobbs Brief Features, d/b/a pro Personnel Team, Inc., Respondent
Appellant argues that the trial court’s valuation out of marital assets is obviously incorrect and therefore the legal mistreated their discernment in awarding lawyer fees to help you respondent. I affirm partly, reverse to some extent, and you can remand for additional findings. Facts
Respondent withdrew a maximum of $114,241
Appellant Robert S. Snyder and respondent Deborah D. Snyder married into the 1979. During the 1988, this new activities bought HKH Acquisition Company (HKH). Whenever received, HKH’s assets included a $step one,450,000 financial set-aside and you will a beneficial $130,000 bond set aside; their liabilities integrated more $3,000,000 for the deferred taxes. The newest Snyders put HKH since the a hanging team to obtain several hotels, after that made use of the hotels‘ accelerated decline to help you offset HKH’s tax liabilities. Both parties together with had a good 50% share from TriStar Hospitality Management (TriStar), a different organization molded to add government qualities in order to HKH’s hotels.
The fresh activities broke up for the 1994, however, accessible to continue their joint handling of HKH and divide just as one earnings off HKH and you will TriStar. Both parties after that first started, with no other’s education, to withdraw funds from HKH and its own subsidiaries. Appellant withdrew a total of $215,244; he diverted a few of the funds to the almost every other individual enterprises (Alexandria Characteristics, LLC, and you can Snyder & Associates, LLC) and loaned $70,000 of one’s finance so you’re able to Lorraine Lucas, having who he resided.