Blake v. House Offers & Mortgage, 2010 Ohio 2689 (Ohio Application. 6/3/2010)
Blake is attractive the fresh conclusion view choice of your Columbiana State Courtroom out of Well-known Pleas away from Blake’s action facing House Discounts & Financing Co
< 1> This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties ‚ briefs. Pro-se Appellant , Veronica A. , and New England Square Condominium Association , and Home Savings‘ counterclaim against Blake and third party defendants Richard E. Whitley , Heritage Title Agency, Inc. , and Columbiana County Treasurer .
< 2> Blake’s claims against all parties , as well as her defenses against Home Savings‘ counterclaim, were predicated on her allegation that she did not have valid title to her condominium property. On appeal, Blake argues that the trial court erred in finding that her property was not originally and irrevocably dedicated to public use by the original developer, Sitler Construction, Inc. Blake also argues that the trial court erroneously found that Blake owned her property in fee simple, because there was an encumbrance on her property. Finally, Blake argues that the trial court should not have granted Home Savings‘ foreclosure via summary judgment, because Blake presented an issue of material fact regarding the validity of her title to the property, and therefore regarding the validity of the mortgage.
The brand new trial courtroom is why decision denied Blake’s activity getting summation view , supplied Appellee Home Savings‘ actions to have summation wisdom , dismissed Blake’s issue, receive Blake and you will Whitley from inside the default on the promissory notice, and you will purchased a property foreclosure toward Blake’s home loan
< 3> The partial documentation of plats and declarations provided by Blake in the proceedings below do not indicate that her property or the lot on which it is located was ever dedicated by Sitler for public use.